Automated Outputs

Regulatory Documents Generated from the Analysis, Not Written from Scratch

PSUR/PBRER, RMP, CTD 2.5, and HEOR reports produced directly from ArcaScience's analytical pipeline.

Manual Authoring

  • Data analyzed separately from document writing
  • Copy-paste from Excel into Word templates
  • Manual figure creation and table formatting
  • Multiple rounds of QC to catch transcription errors
  • Broken traceability from data to document
  • 12-16 weeks from data lock to submission

ArcaScience Generation

  • Documents generated directly from analytical pipeline
  • Every table, figure, and statistic auto-populated
  • Regulatory format templates built-in (ICH, FDA, EMA)
  • Zero transcription errors — data flows directly to output
  • Complete traceability from raw data to final document
  • 2-5 days from data lock to submission-ready document

Submission-Ready Documents for Every Stage of the Lifecycle

Each output type is formatted to regulatory agency specifications with complete data traceability and audit trail.

1

PSUR / PBRER

ICH E2C(R2) aligned. Automated integration of interval and cumulative safety data. Hours vs 12-16 weeks manual.

Sections Auto-Generated

  • Executive summary
  • Worldwide marketing authorization status
  • Actions taken for safety reasons
  • Changes to reference safety information
  • Estimated exposure and use patterns
  • Data summary (interval and cumulative)
  • Signal evaluation
  • Benefit-risk evaluation and conclusions

Regulatory Compliance

  • ICH E2C(R2) format compliance
  • MedDRA version control
  • WHO-ART to MedDRA mapping
  • Data lock point documentation
  • IBD (International Birth Date) calculation
  • Cumulative data reconciliation
  • Appendix auto-population (line listings, case summaries)
Hours

Generation time

100%

Data accuracy

Zero

Transcription errors

2

Risk Management Plans

EMA GVP Module V. Safety specification, PV plan, risk minimization measures.

Part I: Product Overview

Auto-populated from regulatory database and product master file.

Part II: Safety Specification

Epidemiology, non-clinical, clinical safety data synthesized from AS Profiling Base.

Part III: Pharmacovigilance Plan

Routine PV activities, additional PV activities, milestones, post-authorization studies.

Part IV: Risk Minimization

Routine risk minimization (SmPC, labeling), additional risk minimization measures.

Part V: Summary of RMP

High-level overview for public disclosure, automatically formatted.

Annexes

Protocol summaries, PASS/PAES details, educational materials, all auto-linked.

Compliant with EMA GVP Module V and FDA REMS requirements

3

CTD Module 2.5

ICH M4E structure. Benefit-risk conclusions from quantitative framework. NDA/BLA/MAA ready.

Clinical Overview Sections

  • 2.5.1 Product Development Rationale — Disease background, unmet medical need, benefit-risk considerations guiding development
  • 2.5.2 Overview of Biopharmaceutics — Auto-populated from CMC and clinical pharmacology
  • 2.5.3 Overview of Clinical Pharmacology — PK, PD, drug interactions, special populations
  • 2.5.4 Overview of Efficacy — Primary and secondary endpoints across pivotal trials, effect sizes, subgroup analyses
  • 2.5.5 Overview of Safety — Integrated safety summary with exposure-adjusted rates, signal detection, causality assessment
  • 2.5.6 Benefit-Risk Conclusions — Quantitative benefit-risk framework with MCDA, effects tables, value trees, scenario modeling
  • 2.5.7 Literature References — Auto-generated bibliography with in-text citations

Every statistic, table, and figure in CTD 2.5 traces back to source data with complete audit trail. Regulatory reviewers can verify calculations with one click.

4

HEOR Reports

Value dossiers, comparative effectiveness, payer evidence for NICE, G-BA, HAS, CADTH, PBAC.

Value Dossiers

AMCP Format dossiers for US payers. Clinical, economic, and humanistic outcomes. Budget impact models and cost-effectiveness analyses.

AMCP Format 4.1 compliant

HTA Submissions

NICE Single Technology Appraisal, G-BA early benefit assessment, HAS transparency commission, CADTH Common Drug Review, PBAC submissions.

Supports all major HTA bodies

Comparative Effectiveness

Network meta-analysis for indirect comparisons. Real-world evidence comparative effectiveness studies. MAIC (matching-adjusted indirect comparison) and STC (simulated treatment comparison).

ISPOR best practices

Economic Models

Cost-effectiveness models (CEA), cost-utility analysis (CUA), budget impact models (BIM). Markov models, discrete event simulation, partitioned survival.

CHEERS 2022 compliant reporting

5

Signal Detection Reports

Disproportionality analysis, NLP-based detection, automated signal scoring.

Continuous Monitoring

Weekly, monthly, or event-triggered signal detection runs with automated alerts for threshold exceedance.

Disproportionality Metrics

PRR, ROR, EBGM, IC with 95% confidence intervals. Multi-item analysis for drug-event combinations.

Prioritization Scoring

Automated signal prioritization based on seriousness, novelty, clinical significance, and regulatory impact.

Configurable reporting cadence — weekly, monthly, or event-triggered. Full audit trail for regulatory inspection readiness. Every signal links back to source cases with one click.

Four-Layer Validation Before Output Generation

Every automated output undergoes programmatic validation before release to ensure regulatory compliance and data accuracy.

Cross-Reference Validation

Every statistic is checked against source data. Tables cross-referenced with text. Figures verified against underlying data. Internal consistency checks for cumulative vs interval data.

Data Currency Checks

Automated verification that all data sources are up-to-date. MedDRA version consistency. Data lock point documentation. Regulatory database snapshot timestamps.

Regulatory Format Validation

ICH, FDA, EMA format compliance checks. Required sections present and complete. Numbering and referencing consistency. Appendix cross-references validated.

Audit Trail Verification

Complete data lineage from raw data to output. User actions logged with timestamp and rationale. Version control for all analytical decisions. 21 CFR Part 11 compliant audit trail.

50+

Submissions Accepted

FDA, EMA, PMDA approvals

83%

Time Reduction

vs manual authoring

Zero

Transcription Errors

Data flows directly to output

100%

Audit Trail

Full traceability

See a Sample Regulatory Document

Request a sample PSUR, RMP, or CTD 2.5 generated by ArcaScience to see the difference between automated generation and manual authoring.

Request Sample Documents View Case Studies